Deterministic Policy Outcome Lattices
Every external dispatch or regulated action is pre-authorized through an immutable, versioned lattice. Actions cannot execute on stale or caller-asserted permissions.
Technological Architecture & Intellectual Property
35 U.S.C. § 111(b) · Four Priority Applications
Architectural Defensibility.Four U.S. Patents Pending.
CUBE Collective architects reusable, evidence-bound core infrastructure for regulated execution, real-time multi-rail financial routing, model-agnostic AI deliberation, and distributed commerce. Four foundational U.S. provisional utility patent application families are acknowledged and pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
USPTO Filing Date · October 15, 2026
Micro Entity Status Confirmed
Sole Inventor: Felix Pablo Parentini Auda
221 Pages Spec · 79 Drawing Sheets
4Patent families
100%Acknowledged receipts
Oct 15, 2026Priority date
CUBE IP CoreFoundational
Defensibility
Defensibility
Family 01OneCare · Regulated Actions
Family 02Atlas · Financial Routing
Family 03Assembly · AI Deliberation
Family 04Kadolia · Rooted Commerce
Click any pillar to inspect its architectural invariants · 12-month international conversion window
01 · Foundational Architecture
Invariant 01 · Regulated Execution
Invariant 02 · Financial Routing
Invariant 03 · Multi-Model AI
Invariant 04 · Distributed Commerce
Engineer the hard primitives once. Protect them mathematically.
CUBE Collective operates on a foundational engineering conviction: critical primitives for regulated digital systems—clinical data boundaries, financial transaction routing, consensus-driven AI synthesis, and decentralized manufacturing—must be engineered once with mathematical precision and governed deterministically across all operational surfaces.
Value-Free Evidence Boundaries
Authorization proofs carry structural dimensions and verifiable invariants without exposing underlying monetary balances or protected healthcare information (PHI).
Provider-Neutral Consensus Synthesis
Multi-model computational intelligence is gated behind claim-level verification and strict per-turn participant eligibility, eliminating single-vendor failure and hallucination risks.
Root-Bound State Coordination
Distributed commerce transactions compile from a single immutable configuration root, preventing duplicate physical production during network retries or partner failover.
02 · Official USPTO Records
U.S. Provisional Utility Patent Applications Docket.
The following schedule records the four official utility patent application families acknowledged by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) under 35 U.S.C. § 111(b), detailing their official bibliographic identifiers, primary product applications, and statutory scopes:
| Family & Docket | Product Pillar | USPTO Application Record | Priority & Sole Inventor | Statutory Scope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Family 01
U.S. Patent Pending
CUBE-ONECARE-US-PROV-001 ↓
|
CUBE OneCare & HARDWON Regulated Clinical & Biomechanical Graph | Confirmation #4843 · PC #83238406 | Oct 15, 2026 · 19:30:23 ET Felix Pablo Parentini Auda · 71 pp. / 25 sheets |
Evidence-bound, policy-gated execution and reconciliation of regulated digital actions; multi-channel terminal race exclusion (QR, NFC card-present, web).
|
|
Family 02
U.S. Patent Pending
CUBE-ATLAS-EBC-US-PRV-001 ↓
|
CUBE Atlas & simpleTap Multi-Rail Financial Orchestration | Confirmation #1650 · PC #83239251 | Oct 15, 2026 · 20:01:00 ET Felix Pablo Parentini Auda · 43 pp. / 15 sheets |
Evidence-bound financial route authorization, continuous revalidation, and fail-closed multi-rail payment orchestration with zero-drift settlement governance.
|
|
Family 03
U.S. Patent Pending
CUBE-CONSNSUS-US-PROV-001 ↓
|
CUBE Assembly Governed Multi-Model Intelligence | Confirmation #5190 · PC #83240348 | Oct 15, 2026 · 20:27:03 ET Felix Pablo Parentini Auda · 54 pp. / 19 sheets |
Governed multi-model deliberation with per-turn participant eligibility, claim-level factual grounding, and provider-neutral consensus synthesis.
|
|
Family 04
U.S. Patent Pending
CUBE-KADOLIA-US-PROV-001 ↓
|
Kadolia Distributed Commerce Ecosystem | Confirmation #9284 · PC #83240190 | Oct 15, 2026 · 20:16:48 ET Felix Pablo Parentini Auda · 53 pp. / 20 sheets |
Root-bound orchestration of on-demand commerce across heterogeneous execution sources; duplicate manufacturing prevention and submission-time formulation gating.
|
03 · Architectural Deep Dive
Detailed Analysis of the Four Invention Families.
Each patent application embodies a distinct mathematical and operational advance in distributed systems architecture, solving foundational state consistency, policy gating, and multi-rail routing bottlenecks:
Family 01 · Docket CUBE-ONECARE-US-PROV-001
U.S. App. 64/177,498
Evidence-Bound Regulated Execution & Terminal Race Exclusion
Title: Systems and Methods for Evidence-Bound, Policy-Gated Execution and Reconciliation of Regulated Digital Actions
Conventional enterprise platforms authorize actions at an outer API layer and forward loosely coupled payloads to internal destinations. If user permissions, consents, or external regulations change between authorization and dispatch, stale state executes unchecked.
Core Architectural Invariants
- Deterministic Policy Lattice: Every proposed digital action compiles into an immutable, versioned record evaluated against a formal outcome lattice before execution.
- Field-Level Disclosure Constraints: Outbound payloads are strictly minimized (HIPAA Safe Harbor / Minimum Necessary), isolating private fields from third-party processors.
- Multi-Channel Terminal Race Exclusion: On mobile payment and attendance terminals, single-use QR codes, card-present NFC, and web checkouts are made mutually exclusive for a given invoice via database-enforced claim serialization, preventing double capture.
- Tenant-Sealed Biomechanical Graph: Integrates the consolidated HARDWON engine—mapping body metrics, clinical protocols, and facility scheduling into verified action chains.
- Advisory Containment: Multi-model AI operates solely as an advisory participant; it is mathematically prevented from minting authorization tokens or causing direct state transitions.
Specification Filing: 71 pages text · 25 drawing sheets
Filed: Oct 15, 2026 · 19:30:23 ET
Family 02 · Docket CUBE-ATLAS-EBC-US-PRV-001
U.S. App. 64/177,527
Evidence-Bound Financial Route Authorization & Revalidation
Title: Evidence-Bound Financial Route Authorization and Revalidation
Financial platforms commonly treat provider credentials as static connections. A stored credential does not prove that an account is legally or operationally authorized for a given tenant, merchant, currency corridor, operating mode, or transaction activity.
Core Architectural Invariants
- Value-Free Evidence Certificates: Authorizations rely on structured cryptographic tokens that attest to compliance and route eligibility without holding or exposing monetary balances.
- Server-Held Scope Derivation: Operating modes and routing dimensions are strictly derived from server-held configuration, preventing client-side parameter injection or route self-approval.
- Pre-Dispatch Revalidation: Candidate routes undergo continuous revalidation at the operational boundary against credential freshness, licensing scope, and settlement callback validity.
- Fail-Closed Multi-Rail Orchestration: When routing transactions across disparate acquiring channels, card networks, and instant bank rails, any invariant failure halts dispatch cleanly without indeterminate financial state.
- Settlement Governance: Enforces tamper-evident reconciliation records for chargebacks, reserve thresholds, and payout returns.
Specification Filing: 43 pages text · 15 drawing sheets
Filed: Oct 15, 2026 · 20:01:00 ET
Family 03 · Docket CUBE-CONSNSUS-US-PROV-001
U.S. App. 64/177,544
Governed Multi-Model Deliberation & Consensus Gate
Title: Systems and Methods for Governed Multi-Model Deliberation with Per-Turn Participant Eligibility, Claim-Level Grounding, and Provider-Neutral Synthesis
Deploying a single frontier model creates catastrophic single-point-of-failure vulnerabilities, correlated training biases, and sycophantic hallucinations. Furthermore, passing sensitive data across unverified LLM endpoints violates jurisdictional privacy mandates.
Core Architectural Invariants
- Per-Turn Participant Eligibility: Deliberation controller dynamically computes which models may participate on a turn-by-turn basis based on data sensitivity, signed BAAs, and server jurisdiction.
- De-Identified Sub-Question Partitioning: Splits complex user inquiries into sanitized, de-identified logical sub-tasks distributed to specialized models.
- Cross-Examination & Claim Grounding: Competing model outputs are systematically cross-examined across distinct model families; claims are scored individually against verified source facts.
- Disagreement-Gated Execution: Downstream actions (refunds, clinical recommendations, deployments) are automatically withheld whenever inter-model divergence exceeds threshold.
- Compact Intent Language (CIL): Compiled deterministically from natural language to serve as a compact, structured inter-agent communication protocol.
- Provider-Neutral Synthesis: Synthesizes final operator answers without leaking third-party provider names or routing heuristics into user-facing text.
Specification Filing: 54 pages text · 19 drawing sheets
Filed: Oct 15, 2026 · 20:27:03 ET
Family 04 · Docket CUBE-KADOLIA-US-PROV-001
U.S. App. 64/177,538
Root-Bound On-Demand Commerce & Formulation Compliance
Title: Systems and Methods for Root-Bound Orchestration of On-Demand Commerce Across Heterogeneous Execution Sources
On-demand commerce systems sell goods that do not exist until ordered, fulfilling orders through third-party print-on-demand, supplement laboratories, or packaging services. Network timeouts during order submission routinely cause double physical manufacturing or abandoned orders.
Core Architectural Invariants
- Single Immutable Configuration Root: Customer-visible proofs and source-native manufacturing payloads are derived from a single cryptographic root, guaranteeing proof-production parity.
- Duplicate Manufacturing Prevention: Binds execution ownership and fallback logic to the immutable root, ensuring retry attempts across heterogeneous providers cannot produce multiple physical items for a single paid order.
- Regulated Formulation Gating: In dietary supplements and private-label formulations, marketing claims and ingredient specifications are checked against active regulatory lists at the exact submission moment.
- Boundary Containment: Interacts with external manufacturer APIs through sanitized, minimized order artifacts, safeguarding brand owner proprietary IP and customer identity.
Specification Filing: 53 pages text · 20 drawing sheets
Filed: Oct 15, 2026 · 20:16:48 ET
04 · Novelty & International Strategy
Protection 01
Protection 02
Protection 03
Why Complete Enablement Filings Remain Under Trade Secret Isolation.
CUBE Collective strictly complies with global patent harmonization frameworks, including the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT):
Preservation of Absolute Novelty
Unlike the United States (which provides a 12-month inventor grace period under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)), key global jurisdictions (European Patent Office, Japan, China, Latin America) enforce strict absolute novelty. Any public disclosure of full technical enablement before filing an international non-provisional application permanently forfeits foreign patentability.
Confidentiality under 35 U.S.C. § 122
Provisional patent applications filed under 35 U.S.C. § 111(b) are held in strict legal confidentiality by the USPTO. They are neither published nor examined unless and until claimed as priority in a non-provisional application (typically 18 months post-filing). Maintaining full specifications under trade secret protection preserves dual-track defensibility.
Deterrence Without Enablement Leakage
Publishing verified USPTO application numbers, confirmation identifiers, and conceptual architectural scopes establishes indisputable public priority and constructive notice under 35 U.S.C. § 287(a), while keeping detailed mathematical proofs and algorithmic claim trees protected from competitor cloning.
05 · Due Diligence Desk
Confidential Institutional Patent Diligence Packet.
Full 221 pages of specification text, 79 sheets of formal technical drawings, prior art matrices, and independent practitioner memorandums are made available exclusively to verified institutional investors, underwriting counsel, and qualified enterprise partners during active due diligence under an executed mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).
Protocol for Institutional Diligence Access
To request access to the confidential CUBE Collective Patent Diligence Packet, institutional representatives and legal counsel may submit a formal request to our Office of Intellectual Property & Legal Affairs. Upon mutual NDA execution, the following verified artifacts are provisioned in a watermarked diligence room:
- Official USPTO Electronic Filing Receipts & ADS: Unredacted Form PTO/AIA/14 Application Data Sheets and Payment Center receipts for all four priority families.
- Complete Enablement Specifications (221 Pages): Full mathematical models, state machine definitions, and formal claim trees across Families 01 through 04.
- Formal Patent Drawings (79 Sheets): Architectural block diagrams, sequence flows, and data-boundary schematics filed with the USPTO.
- Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) & Prior-Art Matrices: Comparative claim differentiation and clean-room engineering provenance records.
06 · Legal Disclosures
Statutory Notice & 35 U.S.C. § 292 Compliance.
In accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 287(a) and 35 U.S.C. § 292, CUBE Collective LLC provides this public notice regarding the legal status of its intellectual property assets:
Notice of Provisional Patent Application Status: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued official Electronic Acknowledgement Receipts for U.S. Provisional Patent Applications Nos. 64/177,498, 64/177,527, 64/177,538, and 64/177,544, filed on October 15, 2026, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 111(b). A provisional patent application establishes an official priority date for a 12-month statutory period under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) but is not examined by the USPTO and does not itself grant an issued patent or exclusionary rights. CUBE Collective LLC makes no representation that any application has matured into an issued patent. Full patent protection remains contingent upon timely filing and allowance of subsequent non-provisional utility and international patent applications within the statutory priority window.